top of page

PJ v HB [2023] EWHC 3400: Success in the High Court

  • Writer: Pine Legal
    Pine Legal
  • Jan 31, 2024
  • 1 min read

Updated: Jun 6, 2024

Last month, our in house consultant barrister, Zubair Mughal, appeared before the Hon. Sir Jonathan Cohen in the High Court in an appeal from the family court.


The appeal concerned the reduction of contact, and whether the final hearing judge was justified in reducing contact on the basis that Zubair's client had rejected the findings of fact from a fact-finding hearing.


At paragraph 19, the High Court found:

A non-acceptance of a finding does not necessarily lead to a situation where the frequency of contact should be adjusted. It does not seem to me, in this case, that there is any benefit offered to M by the reduction which the judge imposed.


The full judgment can be found here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/3400.html


At Pine Legal we are family law specialists. We represent mothers, father and grandparents in child arrangement and financial remedy proceedings.


Contact us today to arrange an initial consultation.

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

© 2023 by Pine Legal.

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority 

SRA ID: 8003962

Member-logo-RBG.png
LS Accreditation Family Law Advanced.png

Opening times: 

Monday to Friday: 10 am to 3 pm

 

Between Monday to Friday, the office will be open virtually from 3 pm to 5 pm. 

 

Saturday: Only by prior appointments.

Pine Legal

Vista Centre

19A, Floor 2

50 Salisbury Rd,

Cranford, Hounslow
TW4 6JQ

T: 07590617152

  • Instagram
bottom of page